Home All Articles Opinion Spin CycleVictory for the San Diego GOP!
March 27 2013 12:09 PM

Granted, it comes at community-planning level

Sound trumpets! Let our bloody colours wave! And either victory, or else a grave.

—William Shakespeare

Imagine a Republican Party victory in San Diego these days minus fanfare. No chest thumping on social media from local party chairman Tony Krvaric that the end days are approaching for socialists and union stooges. Instead, utter silence.

Well, imagine no more! Now, it wasnt a big win last week—three seats on the Navajo Community Planners Inc. (NCPI) board, an advisory panel of residents, business types and landowners that deliberates over development affecting Del Cerro, San Carlos, Grantville and Allied Gardens. But, hey, when youre hot, etc.

Maybe it was the ease of the election win—a trio of men all tied to the pro-development Building Industry Association of San Diego County, only one facing competition. (As a community member told Spin Cycle, Show up with your wife, and youre in!) Or maybe it was the use of overkill to secure those spots. Whatever the reason, the episode has a host of folks holding their noses.

From what Spin has pieced together, it began with an email from Mike McSweeney, a familiar face in local political funny pages. A loyal soldier in the local Republican Party, McSweeney gained notoriety in 2008 as campaign manager of then-Mayor Jerry Sanders reelection effort after he slipped disparaging material to dreadlocked mayoral candidate Eric Bidwell to use against Sanders rival, Steve Francis. Instead, Bidwell went public, and McSweeney awkwardly stepped down.

This time, McSweeney—the local BIAs senior public-policy adviser and a Navajo planning board member himself—sent an email to BIA contacts requesting support at the March 18 annual Navajo election for 3 gentlemen he described as solid, pro-business Republicans.

Mayor [Bob] Filners mantra is well be listening to the community and he looks for a stronger role from community Planning groups like NCPI, McSweeney wrote in the March 12 email, which came attached to an official-looking flyer noting the date, time and location of the upcoming election and urging support for BIA compatriots Matt Adams (his boss and a registered lobbyist), Steve Grimes (head of its subcontractor council) and John LaRaia (chairman and CEO of the BIAs political action committee).

In his email, McSweeney targets current Navajo chairman Anthony Wagner as Mat Kostrinskys campaign manager and Filner ally, adding, Having a business friendly voice on NCPI is critical to balance the far left activists who already sit on the board. (Republicans actually outnumber Democrats on the board 3-to-1.)

Kostrinsky is the former union political director who lost to District 7 Councilmember Scott Sherman in last Junes primary. Kostrinsky recently ended a stint on the planning board.

McSweeneys email found its way to Shermans wife, Norma Mouet, a politically active community member. On March 13, Mouet forwarded McSweeneys email to her contacts, adding in all caps: WE NEED YOUR HELP! ITS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT WE VOTE FOR THESE 3 GENTLEMEN. SHOW UP, VOTE AND YOU MAY LEAVE. THE OTHERS BUS PEOPLE IN---- THEY WANT TO TAKE OVER THE PLANNING GROUP, WE NEED TO STOP THEM. BRING A FRIEND OR NEIGHBOR TOO.

Days later, letters from a group calling itself Navajo Republicans for Better Planning began dropping in neighborhood mailboxes. Spin could find no one in the community whod ever heard of the group, but the signatory was all too familiar—GOP honcho Krvaric. So, too, were the included phone number and P.O. Box—local GOP contact listings.

On Monday, March 18th we will have the opportunity to elect good Republicans to the Navajo Planning Group Board of Directors, Krvaric wrote, bungling the name. Too often these boards are run by Democrats who do not share our values.

These Republicans, Krvaric added, will ensure that our communitys interests are well represented and that you will always have a voice. He then asks recipients to join me in voting for the trio, with a concluding Hope to see you there, every vote counts! 

No attendees of the March 18 election at Zion Avenue Church contacted by Spin could recall seeing the GOP chairman there. And why would they? Krvaric, who lives in Scripps Ranch and works in Rancho Bernardo, was ineligible to vote.

Spin Cycle reached out unsuccessfully to Krvaric and McSweeney for their take on the election antics.

Cindy Martin, an Allied Gardens resident and constructionindustry worker who recently completed nine years on the Navajo board, received the correspondences and had two words to describe them: offensive and disrespectful.

How dare these people try to politicize our election process! she told Spin. Ive never heard of Navajo Republicans for Better Planning, and I sure dont need someone telling me, as a Republican, that I need to fall in line with my community-planning-board choices. That really ticked me off.

Martin said she asked Sherman, who attended the March 18 election, point-blank about his wifes involvement. He told me, That was my wife, not me, she said.

Reached by phone, Mouet said I dont when asked if she had thoughts about the appearance of undue influence, considering her close ties to Sherman, and defended her involvement as a private citizen exercising her free-speech rights.

Asked about the involvement of the Republican Party in such a low-level election effort, Mouet said, I could show you all kinds flyers that I get, and letters. But from a party chairman? It is not unusual. Im sorry, I gotta go, she said, then hung up.

In a statement, Diana Palacios, Shermans communications director, echoed the First Amendment defense, arguing that right is not canceled out by the fact that she is married to an elected official.

Adams, the only candidate among the three who faced opposition, told Spin in an email that Kostrinsky is alone in making the partisanship claim and hinted at sour grapes for losing to Sherman. To which Kostrinsky, a Democrat, replied, Partisan? I voted for Matt [Adams]! The Navajo group, Adams added, will be the final arbiter on complaints Kostrinskys filed regarding the unusual electioneering.

Thats not totally correct. Council Policy 600-24, which governs the citys 42 planning groups, not only prohibits slates of candidates but also places final investigative authority with the Mayors office, an intriguing scenario potentially pitting Krvaric and Co. against Filner, the man they love to hate.

If Spins planning anything, its to keep an eye out for that.

Got a tip? Send it to johnl@sdcitybeat.com or follow John R. Lamb on Twitter @johnrlamb.


See all events on Friday, Oct 9