Feedback from our readers
Our readers give us a piece of their mind
There but for the grace…
I have been deeply moved by your “Homeless Person of the Week” column. Judging by how often I see cruel and callous treatment of the homeless in this town, I imagine the column serves as a wakeup call to all.
I was particularly moved by Annette Cooper’s story [“The Front Lines,” Dec. 12]. Annette’s misfortune is all too common and can befall any one of us.
Lindsay O’Connor,
Talmadge
Portrait of an artist
In response to your recent feature on “pop artist” Jamie Roxx [“Art & Culture,” Dec. 5], I would love to see the following open letter to Jamie Roxx published:
Dear Jamie Roxx,
You owe me a portrait. This portrait I won back in March 2007 at the grand opening of Pop Noir. In August 2007, I finally started pestering you to see what the fuck was taking so long. For about a month, you continued to say you’d get it to me that weekend. It is now 2008, and I still have not received it. I leave you voicemails that you won’t return and send you e-mails to which you won’t respond.
Anyone can make a name for himself with free publicity by attaching his name to an event offering a “winner” his services for free when he doesn’t intend to actually deliver on those services. I would love for you to prove me wrong, but I suspect that you are just one of those classless people lacking the proper integrity to actually follow through on your word. I know that I am not the only person you have done this to, as I am good friends with at least one other “winner” of a Jamie Roxx portrait who has never even been contacted by you.
Thanks for nothing.
Eric Gapp,
Downtown
Extinct is forever
Great story you wrote about Tatiana [“Presently Tense,” Jan. 2]. You conveyed my feelings so very eloquently—this didn’t have to happen. I’ve read where some people have said the tigers shouldn’t be in zoos anyway. Either way, whether the tigers are in their natural habitat or in an enclosure, seems their fate is in our hands—us humans, the so-called “higher race”—and their outcome is always the same: death. Very, very sad. People don’t seem to realize or care that extinct is forever.
Thank you for your story—I only wish it could be published everywhere!
Carol McClarey,
Halifax, Mass.
The law and the church
Thank you for your article “Being neighborly: Pacific Beach church under fire for providing meals to the homeless” [“The Front Lines,” Dec. 19].
Neighborhood Code Compliance is part of the Development Services Department (DSD) under Mayor Sanders.
The location of the Pacific Beach United Methodist Church is zoned multi-family residential (RM-1-1), according to Grid 22 of the city’s official zoning map.
According to Municipal Code Section 131.0422, Table 131-04B, Page 15: Churches & Places of Religious Assemble are permitted uses. However, Homeless Facilities, Congregate Meal Facilities, Emergency Shelters, Homeless Day Centers are not permitted uses.
Feeding the poor is part of the church’s mission from God, and is a tenet of their religion. Article 1 of the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Under the protection of the United States Constitution, the city cannot harass the church in its mission. Other churches have solved similar problems in controlling their members and guests throughout the centuries.
I am sure that the church and neighbors can come to an agreement with the help of the city.
Katheryn Rhodes and Conrad Hartsell,
La Playa
On the execution fence
Thank you for a provocative editorial on the death penalty [Jan. 2]. I seem to have a problem with both sides of this issue. As usual, people polarize into two sides and only seem to present the facts that will support their respective side.
In your editorial, you state that you are biased, which is about as honest as anyone gets regarding such issues. You include a variety of statistics; however, upon mentioning that economists have concluded that the murder rate declines with more executions, you neglected to provide the statistics for this conclusion. Could this be because it did not support your side?
This is where I have a problem with your editorial, and this same scenario seems to prevail regarding other issues in the U.S. We are a country of more than 300 million people living in a world that is rapidly becoming overcrowded and competing for limited resources. We must be objective to keep our country strong and on the right path. Someone must start thinking about the good of the whole.
As for the death penalty, I’m still sitting on the fence, as I’m not sure who to believe.
Ron Harris,
Scripps Ranch
Missed one
You left the great Nickelodeon Records store off your listing of places to dig through crates of vinyl.
Nickelodeon has good selection and prices, very funny and friendly staff and cool music, novelties and antiques. I have gotten lots of records from there, and it should be brought to the attention of record seekers.
David Wasserman,
El Cerrito
Editor’s note: Nickelodeon Records is located at 3335 Adams Ave. in Normal Heights. The website is www.nickelodeonrecords.com.





Comments
I let it go once but I can't let it go twice. I'm responding to the editorial (1/2) and Ron Harris' letter (1/16) discussing the death penalty's value as a deterrent to murder. Unlike Ron, I was dissappointed to see CityBeat include this statistic in the editorial - not because I enjoy reading biased editorials (though I do!) but because it is simply wrong.
The studies CityBeat was referring to could be those by economists at Emory U. and UC Denver. In the Emory study for instance the researchers conclude each execution results in 18 (+-10) murders. A re-examination of the same data by economists at other institutions comes to the exact opposite conclusion: that they result in 18 more murders!
According to a 6/18/07 submission to the Huffington Post by Cassy Stubbs (full disclosure - she's an ACLU attorney) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cassy-stub...) there are many problems with these studies. "Jeffrey Fagan, a professor at Columbia Law School and an expert on statistics, testified to Congress that the Emory and Denver studies were 'fraught with numerous technical and conceptual errors,' and 'fail[ed] to reach the demanding standards of social science.'"
One statement in the post rings especially true to me: "The truth is that it might be impossible to determine a true statistical relationship between homicides and executions because the number of executions is so small compared to the number of homicides. But what we can say with certainty is that there is no legitimate statistical evidence of deterrence."
Thanks
Mike Stevens
Ocean Beach
Back when Bill Clinton was president, political satirist Mort Sahl used to tell this joke:
George Washington couldn’t tell a lie. George Bush couldn’t tell the truth. Bill Clinton couldn’t tell the difference.
Do we really need eight more years of the Clintons in the White House?
Joe Beverly
Reno, Nevada